As I sat at my desk on Thursday trying to write my midterm
exams for my classes, I must admit that I was quite discouraged. It’s one thing
to expect my students to learn and understand the difficult topics in the
curriculum, but it’s a whole new battle when it comes to the national exams. I
fully believe that challenging students is the only way they will ever reach
their full potential, but the challenge must be reasonable and attainable. When
the material is so far beyond comprehension, then what is the purpose of even
attempting? And when the only thing that matters is your national exam at the
end of the year…well, then, what is the
purpose?
Just to give you an idea of what I mean, one of the topics
Form 2 learns is transposition of formulas. Simply put, rearranging formulas to
make various letters the subject…
Ok, like this. Make y the subject of ax + by + c = 0.
by = -ax – c
by = -ax – c
y = (-ax - c)/b
Really, it’s simple algebra. Nothing more than a little
rearranging. And my students actually do understand it for the most part! They
can transpose simple to moderately complex formulas, which in my opinion, as a
sophomore in high school, is great! However, the kicker is when they get to
their national exam in November, and are expected to solve problems like this:
Make g the subject of
the formula.
WHY??? What is the purpose of asking such a difficult
question? Why not simply test for understanding of the concept instead of
targeting the top 0.1% of the students here. To be honest, when I tried to
solve this problem, I also got it wrong…and I have a college degree in
mathematics and was taught in my native language. When I plan my lessons, I try
to target the middle of the class because I feel inadequate if I teach to the
top 2 students out of 75 kids in my classroom. But at the same time, if I don’t
focus solely on those 2, then they won’t pass either because we won’t cover
enough of the curriculum. But even for them, they will have a rough time
passing even if I taught only the two of them every day of the week for 2
hours. And I say this sincerely, as I don’t know if I would be able to score much
over 20% (a passing score) without a book or a calculator. Sorry for the
rambling…but this is my daily struggle…
When it really comes down to it, it breaks my heart for
these students. They are facing so many challenges in life already: carrying
water on their heads daily, walking several kilometers to and from school, not
knowing when they will get their next meal or how they will pay for their
school fees, and studying by candlelight. And then to expect them to learn such
a demanding curriculum on top of all of this. The reality of it just seems
unfair. And then I have students ask me “Why all white people are brighter than
black people if we all pray to a single God?” Well, I might think that too if
the roles were reversed. Even though some of my students are brilliant,
including the student who asked this question.
They just have a skewed perspective because they think to be “bright”
they need to know how to derive the quadratic formula on their national exams.
(Even I wouldn’t want to derive the quadratic formula…and I love math a whole
heck of a lot!)
So this is it. The reality of it. And while I won’t be able
to teach my students everything they need to know, and while the vast majority
won’t pass their exams, if we can enjoy our remaining classes together and if I
can leave knowing that I’ve at least managed to teach everyone something, then I’ll
take it as a success.
No comments:
Post a Comment